<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tutorial: OSPF Network Types and Frame Relay Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/</link>
	<description>Helping You Become a Network Ninja</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:21:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jit Anbu</title>
		<link>http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jit Anbu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/#comment-12275</guid>
		<description>Nice article! 

You might want to add (in the summary section) that in point-multipoint NBMA the HUB router needs to statically assign a neighbour statement to its SPOKES under the OSPF process.

Jit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article! </p>
<p>You might want to add (in the summary section) that in point-multipoint NBMA the HUB router needs to statically assign a neighbour statement to its SPOKES under the OSPF process.</p>
<p>Jit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modem</title>
		<link>http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7097</link>
		<dc:creator>modem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/#comment-7097</guid>
		<description>great article. i study for the bsci and the books are lacking explanations:
1. why dont you need DR on **some** topolofgies? 
2. why do you **somtimes** need to configure manually the neighbors?

only now, thanks to you, i discovered the difference between RFC&#039;s NBMA and Cisco&#039;s P2MP-NB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article. i study for the bsci and the books are lacking explanations:<br />
1. why dont you need DR on **some** topolofgies?<br />
2. why do you **somtimes** need to configure manually the neighbors?</p>
<p>only now, thanks to you, i discovered the difference between RFC&#8217;s NBMA and Cisco&#8217;s P2MP-NB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4239</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>great articles!

1 remark, in the article is said:

OSPF treats Point-to-Multipoint networks as a collection of point-to-point links. A DR/BDR is not required in these networks as OSPF Packets are unicast to known neighbors. 

Shouldn&#039;t this be multicast? for discovering the neighbours. Otherwise there is no difference with the &#039;point-to-multipoint no broadcast&#039; type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great articles!</p>
<p>1 remark, in the article is said:</p>
<p>OSPF treats Point-to-Multipoint networks as a collection of point-to-point links. A DR/BDR is not required in these networks as OSPF Packets are unicast to known neighbors. </p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t this be multicast? for discovering the neighbours. Otherwise there is no difference with the &#8216;point-to-multipoint no broadcast&#8217; type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arden Packeer, CCIE #20716</title>
		<link>http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Arden Packeer, CCIE #20716</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mar! All fixed. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mar! All fixed. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mar Apuhin</title>
		<link>http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ardenpackeer.com/routing-protocols/tutorial-ospf-network-types-and-frame-relay-part-2/#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Hi Arden,

Should this be 30? instead of 10?

&quot;You can see the default timers for a point-to-multipoint non-broadcast network are 10 seconds and 120 seconds for the hello and dead intervals respectively.&quot;

Nice Tutorials. Thanks.

http://cciepilot.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arden,</p>
<p>Should this be 30? instead of 10?</p>
<p>&#8220;You can see the default timers for a point-to-multipoint non-broadcast network are 10 seconds and 120 seconds for the hello and dead intervals respectively.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nice Tutorials. Thanks.</p>
<p><a href="http://cciepilot.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
